Round 2 Peer Assessment Results This shows the results of the peer evaluation process. Portfolios are ranked according to the percent of revenues available in each market that were earned by each portfolio. The Skills column shows the computer skill rating you reported in the skills assessment task that I assigned the first week of this course. . Note: The results shown here may differ from those shown in last weeks task because last week's task included all submissions, including those in the pending, revise and accepted states. This table only includes submissions that were actually accepted. # Portfolio TEB % S Market Deposits 1 SaraRBartos 36.00 16.00 4 3=225.00 5 4 4 5 0 5 4 0 5 0 0 4 2 MichaelRMcCaffery 40.00 14.55 3 4=275.00 6 10 0 0 3 3 0 4 4 0 5 3 2 3 JohnAndre 29.00 12.89 5 3=225.00 3 0 4 4 0 4 4 0 3 4 0 3 4 MaryANademin 35.00 12.73 4 2=275.00 3 2 8 2 0 4 3 3 2 0 4 4 5 RonaldESappenfield 27.00 12.00 0 3=225.00 2 4 2 2 0 3 5 0 0 4 0 5 6 JonathonPerrelli 32.00 11.64 5 2=275.00 3 3 6 2 0 0 3 2 4 4 2 3 7 JohnGPayneJr 31.00 11.27 5 4=275.00 0 5 0 4 3 3 0 4 2 0 1 6 3 8 KatrinaJJoseph 25.00 11.11 6 3=225.00 3 4 0 4 0 2 3 0 3 3 0 3 9 CarolIvory 36.00 11.08 3 1=325.00 3 4 3 3 0 4 2 3 4 3 3 2 2 10 ElaineGreene 30.00 10.91 7 2=275.00 2 2 0 2 0 4 4 2 2 2 5 5 11 MarkRDuke 30.00 10.91 8 4=275.00 2 0 0 10 3 2 7 2 2 0 2 0 0 12 DonnaMSink 29.00 10.55 4 2=275.00 4 0 2 2 0 3 3 3 1 4 4 3 13 NutnichaSanguanraksa 29.00 10.55 3 2=275.00 3 2 1 4 0 3 4 5 1 4 2 0 14 BethAlwin 32.00 9.85 6 1=325.00 3 0 4 2 5 3 0 2 3 3 3 1 3 15 RobertLanier 22.00 9.78 6 3=225.00 2 3 2 1 0 3 3 0 2 4 0 2 16 DariaDenissova 31.00 9.54 2 1=325.00 3 2 2 3 2 3 5 0 2 2 3 2 2 17 DanielSullivan 26.00 9.45 5 2=275.00 0 2 1 2 0 3 0 4 5 4 2 3 18 StevenLaFroth 21.00 9.33 7 3=225.00 5 3 2 2 0 1 1 0 3 4 0 0 19 MattPayne 25.00 9.09 5 4=275.00 2 2 0 3 3 2 3 2 2 0 1 2 3 20 BethMcCoy 28.00 8.62 6 1=325.00 4 4 0 2 3 2 0 2 2 3 2 1 3 21 DavidSchatzman 28.00 8.62 7 1=325.00 4 2 3 2 2 2 0 3 1 0 3 3 3 22 MaxineDavis 19.00 8.44 2 3=225.00 2 2 3 1 0 0 3 0 3 3 0 2 23 ChienFuChen 27.00 8.31 4 1=325.00 2 1 2 1 3 0 2 2 2 2 2 7 1 24 ChristopherFeola 27.00 8.31 9 1=325.00 2 1 2 3 1 3 0 2 4 1 1 4 3 25 JulianneMRuddy 22.00 8.00 1 2=275.00 2 4 1 3 0 1 2 0 2 4 2 1 26 StevenGrange 21.00 7.64 6 4=275.00 4 1 0 2 2 4 0 3 0 0 2 1 2 27 WilliamCPurdy 21.00 7.64 6 4=275.00 1 1 0 0 1 1 8 2 1 0 4 0 2 28 HyeunHeeKim 17.00 7.56 0 3=225.00 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 0 2 29 GeorgeBennett 23.00 7.08 8 1=325.00 3 1 1 2 1 3 5 2 1 1 0 1 2 30 RoseJohnson 19.00 6.91 5 4=275.00 3 1 0 3 0 2 0 2 5 0 1 0 2 31 GregoryPBalzer 22.00 6.77 5 1=325.00 0 3 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 2 3 0 1 32 NGALIEUBERTIN 22.00 6.77 1 1=325.00 0 2 2 1 2 2 5 2 1 2 2 1 0 33 JosephJDolan 18.00 6.55 5 2=275.00 3 3 1 3 0 1 0 1 1 1 4 0 34 StephenLNegri 18.00 6.55 3 4=275.00 1 1 0 1 2 1 4 0 3 0 1 1 3 35 WongsiriRianrungroj 18.00 6.55 7 4=275.00 1 2 0 0 2 3 0 2 2 0 4 2 0 36 AliKheder 20.00 6.15 3 1=325.00 0 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 37 CarinaLynch 19.00 5.85 4 1=325.00 1 2 2 0 1 0 2 2 2 3 1 1 2 38 MarkDFlannery 13.00 5.78 4 3=225.00 2 1 2 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 39 GaryCMalloy 15.00 5.45 2 2=275.00 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 3 40 KevinBLefton 15.00 5.45 2 2=275.00 2 2 1 2 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 41 SharonMSouthard 15.00 5.45 8 4=275.00 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 2 4 2 42 JenniferLittle 14.00 5.09 3 2=275.00 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 43 ScottPerksy 14.00 5.09 4 4=275.00 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 3 44 TheresaWerner 14.00 5.09 3 4=275.00 0 1 0 2 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 4 1 45 KevinParra 10.00 4.44 6 3=225.00 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 46 MelindaSPajak 10.00 3.64 7 2=275.00 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 47 ThomasEPorter 9.00 3.27 7 4=275.00 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 48 DavidSSuh 10.00 3.08 5 1=325.00 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 49 PrakittayaChangsila 6.00 2.67 4 3=225.00 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 50 SeanRussell 0.00 0.00 5 3=225.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Legend Student The student name hotlinked to the portfolio url that was reported by resubmitting the registration task TEB The total TEB earned by this student; the sum of the deposits column. % The percentage of the total TEBs available in each market earned by this student. I've sorted the results by the % of Market column, instead of the raw "TEB earned" column, because this adjusts for the different number of people in each market and thus the number of TEB that was available to be earned in each market. TEB*100/(total TEBs in circulation in that market) S (Skill): The computer skill rating from the skills assessment task. Market Which market this student was in. The number after the = is the total TEBs that has been spent within that market to date. Deposits The deposit history. The number of TEB earned by this student from each member of their market. I sorted the results by the % of Market column, instead of the raw "TEB earned" column, to adjust for the different number of people that actively participated in each market and thus the number of TEB that was available to be earned in each market. This presents this table as a histogram. The rows show the percentage of money in each market earned by individuals. The graphics show how many earned each percentage. % # of students who earned that % 16      15   14      13   12          11            10            9                8                7            6                  5                    4      3          2      1   0      This task typically generates classical Gaussian (Bell Curve) distributions that are very similar to the wealth distributions of real market economies. A few gets most of the wealth, some get nothing, and there's a huge middle class in between.