From: Mike Godwin
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 1994 11:12:36 -0400 (EDT)
Topic 627 [eff]: Dateline & "Child-Proofing" Cyberspace
#5 of 6: Ludlow (ludlow) Fri Sep 2 '94 (07:46) 44 lines
For the record, here's the note I sent to Dateline.
to Dateline:
I was very disappointed in last night's segment on the availability
of bomb recipies on the interenet.
The segment was dishonest in that it implied that bomb building
by minors was a new phenomenon, and that it was made possible in
large part by the internet. In fact, this was a problem long before
the internet was even imagined. For example, there are numerous
documented cases of children being maimed by homemade bombs
throughout the 1960's. I would have thought that a careful and
honest news organization would note this fact.
Is the problem worse today than in the 1960's? We were presented
no evidence that it is. For all we know, net-surfing minors are
*less* likely to build bombs than their off-line counterparts. Thus,
the story also failed to document that there is any sort of
correlation, much less causal connection, between "basement
bombers" and the availability of this information over the net.
But isn't this the very first question that a good reporter should
investigate?
Finally, I was struck by the fact that the report seemed to place
the onus of responsibility on the internet rather than the
parents of these bomb-building children. For example, the
parents in question may not have been in a position to know
what the children were downloading , but surely they should
have become suspicious when, as your report indicated, the
children turned a room above the garage into a "bomb
building factory!"
I really think that this report was nothing more than another
poorly researched and poorly documented attempt to whip
concerned parents into a state of hysteria over the evils of
the mysterious internet. I am sorry that NBC has decided to
join that irresponsible disinformation campaign.
Dr. Peter Ludlow
Assoc. Prof.
Dept. of Philosophy
SUNY Stony Brook
Stony Brook, NY 111794