At the suggestion of my associate, Dr. Curtiss Priest, who has been forwarding to me many insightful messages from members of this lis about the development of the NII and community networks, I'd like to share with you the following draft of a piece I've written about the crucial role community networks can play in solving the "equity of access" problem. I share this prior to its print publication in th hope that some of you may give me some feedback. Thanks, Ken Komoski (email: komoski@BNLCL6.BNL.GOV) ______________________________________________________ Bypassing the Poor and Minorities on the Data Highway: Let's BET? Pre-publication DRAFT 9/12/94 by Ken Komoski _______________________________________________________ Recently the NAACP, other civil rights and consumer groups, plus members of Congress have charging the builders of the so called informatio highway with "electronic red-lining,"-- bypassing poor neighborhoods and minority populations, while wiring white, wealthier communities. But don't highways always bypass neighborhoods, or sometimes divide them Maybe it's time to change metaphors. Right now, "toll road" or "cyberspace theme park"seem more apt. What's currently being built is the 21st Century's electronic marketplace. And it's burgeoning with businesse bent on collecting fees from those willing to sign up for cyberspace travel. But there's no free launch; especially for the poor. Currently, those capable of launching themselves are among the nation's 31 million homes that already own at least one computer; the top third economically and technologically, of our nation's 93 million households. And every day families from the middle third of American households are adding to the size of this new marketplace. Nonetheless, it's a marketplace that may forever bypass millions of poor, and marginal middle class families for whom owning a computer, learning how to use it, and paying online fees seem impossible. These bottom 15-20 million families are those Al Gore has in mind whe he warns of an America of "information haves and have-nots." And it's their kids who are most in need the "free education lane" proposed by Senator Hollings. These are the kids in whose schools the computer- student access ratio is apt to be 50-to-1, despite a national average of 14-to-1. But the even more dramatic computer-to-learner access ratio can be found in "have" households, here the computer-to-kid ratio is increasingly, one-to-one. In addition, many of these computer kids spend ten-to-twenty hours a week intently interacting with their computer, and networks of computer-empowered peers -- locally, nationally, and internationally; hours once spent watching TV, or playing Nintendo. In contrast, their poorer peers may get an hour or two a week of computer time at school, while at home, their TV watching is often above the national average of 20-plus hours a week. There's a major social polic question lurking in these numbers: how do we sustain and strengthen education as an equitably-accessible public good, using a powerful and innovative new delivery system, when the new industry building that system is in the business of selling information and learning as marketable goods? Clearly, the businesses building this new industry don't see themselves in the public-good business. Whether they flourish or fail depends on market demand from paying customers. Even flourishing businesses don't enter the public-good marketplace unless an excess profits affords them the luxury of establishing socially-concerned foundations. However, even well-established foundations have yet to move beyond funding conferences on the issue of equitable electronic access at which charges of "electronic redlining" get raised, prompting counter-charges by industry of anti-business bias. Into this charged atmosphere comes news that across the country, in traditionally middle class communities like Queens County, New York, median incomes of Black and other minority families are surpassing those of whites. If, in Queens and elsewhere, such upwardly-mobil minorities are, in fact, being bypassed by the toll road, then electronic redlining will be proved. If on the other hand, the toll road is found to be bypassing poor and struggling middle- class families who lack the money, technology, and know-how to use it, will that be red-lining or economic reality? If so, is this a reality that's likely to change? Possibly, if the traffic on the toll road proves so profitable that its builders agree to create Senator Hollings' proposed toll-free education lane. But that proposal is only for schools. Unfortunately, most school boards and administrators do not yet see at-home electronic access to learning for students as essential to what they are calling "systemic reform." Yet, ironically, the advocates of such reform emphasize the need for more home-school-community connections The good news is that in a few pioneering communities, schools are becoming integral parts of locally-built electronic networks that are connecting them with homes, social services, community centers, libraries, museums, local government and businesses. These community networks are building local opportunities for lifelong learning for families that are truly systemic, along with easy-access on-ramps to the toll road and its hoped-for free lane But even if such a free lane -- plus the local networks to connect to it -- were widely available, poorer households would still need computers, modems, and know-how to access it. As long as this need remains unmet, we are actively creating a nation of information and learning haves and have-nots; a permanent information underclass lacking what's needed to make the human and electronic connection between learning, earning, and personal and family development. But how could it be otherwise? The cost of home computers, modems, and training for an estimated 15-20 million low-income households woul come to more than America spent sending men to the moon Given current fiscal stringencies, there seems little chance of the nation's lowest-income families being able to acquire what's needed to become full participants in a future of better learning and earning via information technology. The chance of this happening may seem slim, even impossible. But the odds can be improve greatly, if businesses are willing to support a unique community-based initiative. Because it may still seem like along shot, let's call it the BET Initiative (Businesses for Equity in Telecomputing ). The "bet" is that American businesses, which currently own more than 150 million personal computers (an estimated 19 million of which are replaced and become recyclable each year) will donate one-out-of- four of these still-useful machines to community-based programs designed to help low-income families to learn and earn home computers and modems. If American businesses are willing to take this bet, millions of families would be able to earn their way into the new world of learning and information In a few communities where businesses are already cooperating with the BET Initiative used business computers are being installed in community centers, connected to a community-wide network. The centers offer family computer training provided by local telecomputing literates. As soon as a low-income family has learned how to function online with their computer, they have earned it. At home, they can use it to communicate, to learn job skills and to access information, particularly daily job postings -- some of which offer the opportunity to earn regular dollars, and others the opportunity to earn Time Dollars, a tax-exempt, volunteer-based, local currency (See: New York Times OP-ED, "When time is Money" 1/9/93). Once earned, Time Dollars are credited to a person's electronic Time Dollars account, managed by the community's telecomputing cooperative. Trainers and managers of the community's Time Dollars Exchange also earn Time Dollars. Any family or person with earned Time Dollars, can use the community's electronic bulletin board service (BBS) to post Time-Dollar jobs for services they need: child care, elder care, assistance with shopping, help in building a database for a local social service agency, etc.. Students working in community service programs can also earn Time Dollars. Once trained, anyone can respond to, post, negotiate and exchange Time-Dollars services online. By tying together a community-managed BET Initiative, a Time Dollars Exchange, and the growing interest in community telecomputing, the problem of the nation's information-have-nots could be solved where it should be solved, at a local grassroot level. To help such grassroot problem solving to happen on a wide scale, leaders in business, in communities, and in local, state, and federal government should consider the following o Businesses interested in supporting theBET Initiative should consider providing a quarter of all their used computers (and modems) to local or regional BET programs. Local and regional phone companies should adopt policies that provide low-income families with telecomputing rates as an extension of curren state-mandated phone rates for the poor -- such as New York's dollar-a-month "life-line" rate. To encourage wide support for local BET programs, the media should encourage all area businesse and computer-rich households to donate used computer equipment. o Communities developing local cooperative telecomputing network should make a strong commitment to achieve access for all community members, with special emphasis on adopting the BET Initiative/Time Dollars Exchange to enable poorer householders to learn-and-earn the computers and modems they'll need to increase community-wide participation. o State governments should consider policies to guarantee that low-income families can not be "electronically red-lined." States also should establish policies that enable them to recycle state-owned computers into local BET Initiatives. They also need to help channel a percentage of the used computers they receive for the federal government local BET programs Most importantly, state and county legislatures should provide local seed-money grants to stimulate grassroots development o community-based telecomputing cooperatives. o The Federal Government and its many agencies need to review policies and programs with the intention of using them to strengthen all of the above efforts. In particular, the Department of Education should emphasize the essential relationship between community telecomputing and systemic educational reform, and support that relationship with vigor. The White House should be willing to provide a letter o commendation to every business and community that supports the BET Initiative. Finally, we all should adopt a policy of saying to those who say that none of these things can happen, "Let's BET?" Here's the ante: a used computer and modem that a low-income family can earn by learning how to use it. If a reasonable number of America's almost 10 million businesses will take that BET seriously, they can help millions o information-have-nots to take their first step toward avoiding being bypassed by the future. ******************************************* Those who want to know more about the BET Initiative, can contact LINCT (Learning and Information Network for Community Telecomputing). LINCT is a nonprofit coalition of organizations helping to develop the BET Initiative in communities nationwide. email: komoski@BNLCL.BNL.GOV --- voice: 516.728.9100 snail mail: LINCT, 103-3 Montauk Hwy., Hampton Bays NY 1194 _______________________________________________________________________________ | W. Curtiss Priest, Ph.D. *********************** | | Center for Information, Technology, & Society * Improving humanity * | | * through technology * | | 466 Pleasant Street *********************** | Melrose, MA 02176-4522 | | Voice: 617-662-4044 Gopher to our publications: | | Fax: 617-662-6882 GOPHER.STD.COM (under nonprofits) | _____________________________________________________________________________|